Post by account_disabled on Dec 30, 2023 22:05:26 GMT -6
Athe establishment of a legal fact to notify the court and prove his claims under the law. The request for summons representing the act of vesting the court must contain all the elements necessary to bring the case to court this presupposing the indication of the evidence on which it is based therefore the legal requirement of submitting the documents attached to the application written in a foreign language in certified copy accompanied by the legalized translation carried out by an authorized translator does not affect the constitutional norms but on the contrary is intended to ensure the fulfillment of the necessary procedural conditions for a thorough settlement of the litigation brought to court.
In connection with the procedural rule regarding the preparation of Country Email List requests and procedural documents only in Romanian the Government invokes the Decision of the Constitutional Court no. of May regarding the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. from Law no. on judicial organization whose arguments he considers applicable mutatis mutandis. . In conclusion the Government maintains that the civil procedural rule is in accordance with the Constitution since regarding the obligation of the legalized translation of documents drawn up in a foreign language attached to the request for.
Summons the legislator does not distinguish as is normal from the perspective of the equality of citizens in before the law between Romanian citizens belonging to national minorities and other citizens this procedural condition being necessary for a thorough resolution of the litigation brought to trial and for the effectiveness of the judicial control exercised by the higher courts. . of unconstitutionality as unfounded showing that the criticized legal provisions do not refer to the language in which the court proceedings are conducted but to the documents used as evidence. The securing of evidence represents that contentious procedure in which the interested party.
In connection with the procedural rule regarding the preparation of Country Email List requests and procedural documents only in Romanian the Government invokes the Decision of the Constitutional Court no. of May regarding the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. from Law no. on judicial organization whose arguments he considers applicable mutatis mutandis. . In conclusion the Government maintains that the civil procedural rule is in accordance with the Constitution since regarding the obligation of the legalized translation of documents drawn up in a foreign language attached to the request for.
Summons the legislator does not distinguish as is normal from the perspective of the equality of citizens in before the law between Romanian citizens belonging to national minorities and other citizens this procedural condition being necessary for a thorough resolution of the litigation brought to trial and for the effectiveness of the judicial control exercised by the higher courts. . of unconstitutionality as unfounded showing that the criticized legal provisions do not refer to the language in which the court proceedings are conducted but to the documents used as evidence. The securing of evidence represents that contentious procedure in which the interested party.